Russia vetoes Western resolution on Syria aid for bypassing Damascus
Russia has vetoed a West-backed draft resolution that called for an extension of aid deliveries from the United Nations to Syria through Turkey without the consent of Damascus.
The vote held at the UN Security Council on Friday sought to extend cross-border aid to the terrorist-held northwestern province of Idlib by a year, bypassing the Syrian government.
“We regret that the efforts of the delegations of Ireland and Norway, the pen holders on the humanitarian dossier, didn’t find the best way of resolving the issue,” said Russia’s deputy envoy to the UN Dmitry Polyanskiy, arguing that the resolution was not in Syria’s interests.
Thirteen UN Security Council members backed the Western draft resolution, while Russia opposed it and China abstained from the vote.
The UN Security Council has been extending the Mechanism for Cross-Border Aid Delivery into Syria (CBM) since 2014.
Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government has repeatedly denounced the cross-border mechanism as a violation of Syria’s sovereignty and a tool to advance Western agendas in the country.
Moscow and Beijing have generally agreed, contending that the UN authorization violates Syria’s sovereignty and the aid to opposition-held territories should instead be routed from Damascus.
After vetoing the resolution, which was proposed by Norway and Ireland, Russia presented a competing resolution that proposed extending the aid by only six months.
China voted in favor of the proposal, while the US, Britain, and France cast their vetoes against it. The resolution thus failed to make headway after a double veto by two veto-yielding members.
Polyanskiy blasted the West’s “stubbornness” and asserted that the West-backed resolution “ignored the sovereignty of Damascus.
Comment
- Middle East’s political future is Facing Incredible Changes
- Behind the Scene of the Election of New Lebanon’s President; Pressures and Coalitions
- Challenges Facing Governance in Post -Assad Syria From extremism to Foreign Intervention
- Tahrir Al-Shaam’s Efforts to Whitewash Itself Through Anti -Iranian Claims
- Aisheh Al-Dis: A Propaganda Tool or a Symbol of a Real Change
- Middle East’s political future is Facing Incredible Changes
- Behind the Scene of the Election of New Lebanon’s President; Pressures and Coalitions
- Challenges Facing Governance in Post -Assad Syria From extremism to Foreign Intervention
- Tahrir Al-Shaam’s Efforts to Whitewash Itself Through Anti -Iranian Claims
- Aisheh Al-Dis: A Propaganda Tool or a Symbol of a Real Change
- Qatar and Turkey are Using Gas as a Political Weapon
- What is Turkey after in Syria?
- How Turkey is Seeking for its Share and the Fate of the Extremist Groups
- The US Has a Dual Standard Behavior Towards Syria and the Region/ Netanyahu’s 30-year project
- A Vague perspective on Syria’s Stability and Security
- Israel is After Disconnecting the Resistance Group in Syria
- A look at the incidents in Syria and its obscure goals
- Why the Zionist regime is forced to accept ceasefire in Lebanon?
- Middle East’s political future is Facing Incredible Changes
- Behind the Scene of the Election of New Lebanon’s President; Pressures and Coalitions
- Challenges Facing Governance in Post -Assad Syria From extremism to Foreign Intervention
- Tahrir Al-Shaam’s Efforts to Whitewash Itself Through Anti -Iranian Claims
- Aisheh Al-Dis: A Propaganda Tool or a Symbol of a Real Change
- Qatar and Turkey are Using Gas as a Political Weapon
- What is Turkey after in Syria?
- How Turkey is Seeking for its Share and the Fate of the Extremist Groups
- The US Has a Dual Standard Behavior Towards Syria and the Region/ Netanyahu’s 30-year project
- A Vague perspective on Syria’s Stability and Security