Editor’s note
A few key points on the Security MOU between Bahrain and the USA
On Wednesday the US and Bahrain signed a security and strategic economic agreement. US secretary of state, Antony Blinken announced that this agreement will extend defense and intelligence collaboration between the two countries.
According to Negaheno report this agreement is based on counter-attacking “external threats”.
Apparently, the word “external” refers to transregional threats and intends to show it does not include threat from Iran but it clearly states that although it differs from the Abraham Accord and the Naghb meeting but it has shared objectives with them.
Second, this agreement is not limited to the US and Bahrain and other middle east friends can also join them.
Since, from one hand there is defined agreement between the like- minded countries in the geographic periphery (not the Persian Gulf countries) and from another hand, the joint objective agreement is formed with the Abraham Accord which has made it possible for Israel to join the agreement and in practice it intends to establish regional intelligence regime led by the US minus Iran in the region.
Third, this agreement is not on the same level as the article 5 of the NATO Treaty and so it will not be able allow its members to spontaneously react in case of external threats. Hence, it differs from the agreement made between the US and KSA but the level of decision making is held by the highest political position.
Naturally, this agreement has no commonality with the local community security regime plan which is initiated by Iran and is also included in the Hormuz peace plan and is also in contrast with the strategic interests of China.
Comment
- Israel’s Strategy: A Feeble Attack but a Media Grandiosity
- Ali Mattar’s Significant Explanations on Hochstein’s Trip and US and Israel’s Conditions
- Would the Hamas Movement Come to an End with the Martyrdom of Yahaya Sinwar
- The Psychological Warfare of the Zionist Regime and the Need for a Credible Narration
- October 7th and a Return to the Zero Point/Why Israel is Thrown Back 70 Years
- Israel’s Strategy: A Feeble Attack but a Media Grandiosity
- Ali Mattar’s Significant Explanations on Hochstein’s Trip and US and Israel’s Conditions
- Would the Hamas Movement Come to an End with the Martyrdom of Yahaya Sinwar
- The Psychological Warfare of the Zionist Regime and the Need for a Credible Narration
- October 7th and a Return to the Zero Point/Why Israel is Thrown Back 70 Years
- Leader awards Fath badge to Gen. Hajizadeh for missile op
- The “Honest Promise 2” operation and its Diplomatic َAppendages
- Gains of Pezeshkian’s Visit to Qatar /Success of the Public Diplomacy
- 5 key points on the outcome of Iran’s attack against the Zionist regime
- Field Facts of the War on Lebanon/ The realities as They Are
- Some Tips on the Escalation of Clashes Between Lebanon and the Zionist Regime
- The Opportunities and Challenges Facing Pezeshkian’s Trip to New York
- Sana’a Possesses Modern Military Techniques and Technologies/ Details of Yemeni Advanced Missiles
- Israel’s Strategy: A Feeble Attack but a Media Grandiosity
- Ali Mattar’s Significant Explanations on Hochstein’s Trip and US and Israel’s Conditions
- Would the Hamas Movement Come to an End with the Martyrdom of Yahaya Sinwar
- The Psychological Warfare of the Zionist Regime and the Need for a Credible Narration
- October 7th and a Return to the Zero Point/Why Israel is Thrown Back 70 Years
- Leader awards Fath badge to Gen. Hajizadeh for missile op
- The “Honest Promise 2” operation and its Diplomatic َAppendages
- Gains of Pezeshkian’s Visit to Qatar /Success of the Public Diplomacy
- 5 key points on the outcome of Iran’s attack against the Zionist regime
- Field Facts of the War on Lebanon/ The realities as They Are