Editor’s note
A few key points on the Security MOU between Bahrain and the USA

On Wednesday the US and Bahrain signed a security and strategic economic agreement. US secretary of state, Antony Blinken announced that this agreement will extend defense and intelligence collaboration between the two countries.
According to Negaheno report this agreement is based on counter-attacking “external threats”.
Apparently, the word “external” refers to transregional threats and intends to show it does not include threat from Iran but it clearly states that although it differs from the Abraham Accord and the Naghb meeting but it has shared objectives with them.
Second, this agreement is not limited to the US and Bahrain and other middle east friends can also join them.
Since, from one hand there is defined agreement between the like- minded countries in the geographic periphery (not the Persian Gulf countries) and from another hand, the joint objective agreement is formed with the Abraham Accord which has made it possible for Israel to join the agreement and in practice it intends to establish regional intelligence regime led by the US minus Iran in the region.
Third, this agreement is not on the same level as the article 5 of the NATO Treaty and so it will not be able allow its members to spontaneously react in case of external threats. Hence, it differs from the agreement made between the US and KSA but the level of decision making is held by the highest political position.
Naturally, this agreement has no commonality with the local community security regime plan which is initiated by Iran and is also included in the Hormuz peace plan and is also in contrast with the strategic interests of China.
Comment
- Tehran -Washington Negotiations in Oman: How can Iran maintain the initiative?
- Tensions Between Turkey and the Zionist Regime: The Vague Future for Syria in the Battle Fields of the Occupiers
- Trump’s Threats against Iran is a Political Maneuver
- Iran has a Lot of Experience When Encountering the US and its Enemies
- Washington has Devoted itself to Israel and Zionism by Ignoring the Rights of the American People
- Tehran -Washington Negotiations in Oman: How can Iran maintain the initiative?
- Tensions Between Turkey and the Zionist Regime: The Vague Future for Syria in the Battle Fields of the Occupiers
- Trump’s Threats against Iran is a Political Maneuver
- Iran has a Lot of Experience When Encountering the US and its Enemies
- Washington has Devoted itself to Israel and Zionism by Ignoring the Rights of the American People
- Trump’s Current Term is a New Phase of Global Tensions and Clashes
- Will the Protests in Syria Enter a New Phase?
- No War No Peace: Netanyahu’s dual strategy for survival
- Director of the New Vision Center for Strategic Studies
- Sayed Hassan’s Funeral Ceremony Was a Global Referendum for the Resistance
- Tensions Arise Between the US and Europe/ New Challenges in Ukraine Peace Negotiations
- Trump’s Idea of Displacing People from Gaza Will Not be Accomplished
- Iran is Still Capable of Changing the Rules of Play in the Region and Worldwide
- Tehran -Washington Negotiations in Oman: How can Iran maintain the initiative?
- Tensions Between Turkey and the Zionist Regime: The Vague Future for Syria in the Battle Fields of the Occupiers
- Trump’s Threats against Iran is a Political Maneuver
- Iran has a Lot of Experience When Encountering the US and its Enemies
- Washington has Devoted itself to Israel and Zionism by Ignoring the Rights of the American People
- Trump’s Current Term is a New Phase of Global Tensions and Clashes
- Will the Protests in Syria Enter a New Phase?
- No War No Peace: Netanyahu’s dual strategy for survival
- Director of the New Vision Center for Strategic Studies
- Sayed Hassan’s Funeral Ceremony Was a Global Referendum for the Resistance