Grossi’s visit to Israel out of phase with IAEA impartiality
Iran says the visit by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s chief Rafael Grossi to Israel ahead of the Monday meeting of the
Board of Governors is in contradiction with the agency’s principles of observing impartiality and maintaining its technical and professional status.
Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian made the remarks in a phone call with the European Union’s foreign policy chief Josep Borrell on Friday while pointing to the “destructive” measures of the Zionist regime, which is the “main culprit of illegal nuclear activities in the world.”
Grossi is on a trip to Tel Aviv and has met the regime’s hawkish Prime Minister Naftali Bennett.
The high-profile visit by Grossi is against the backdrop of the latest report by the IAEA on Iran’s nuclear program amid the stalemate in Vienna talks between Tehran and the P4+1 group of countries to salvage the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Iran has on many previous occasions cautioned the UN nuclear agency against allowing the Israeli regime to influence its independent mandate and decision-making.
In a statement issued on Friday, Israel told the UN nuclear watchdog it would prefer diplomacy to end the stalemate on Iran’s nuclear program. However, the statement said Israel reserves the right to self-defense and could take independent action if the international community fails to stop Iran’s nuclear program within “the relevant time frame.”
According to the statement, the Israeli prime minister “stressed (to Grossi) the importance of the IAEA Board of Governors delivering a clear and unequivocal message to Iran in its upcoming decision.”Grossi said on Twitter that he had met Bennett in Tel Aviv at his invitation and held “important exchanges on topical issues.”
Comment
- Haifa vs. Dahieh is Strongly Pursued by the Resistance
- A Look at Trump’s Second Administration: A War Formation or a Political Gesture
- The Haifa – Dahieh Equation Hizbollah’s Secretary General has Kept his Promise
- Kamala Harris became the victim of Joe Biden’s political outcomes
- Features of the Zionist Peace/ What are the Goals of Those Claiming for Ceasefire in Lebanon?
- Haifa vs. Dahieh is Strongly Pursued by the Resistance
- A Look at Trump’s Second Administration: A War Formation or a Political Gesture
- The Haifa – Dahieh Equation Hizbollah’s Secretary General has Kept his Promise
- Kamala Harris became the victim of Joe Biden’s political outcomes
- Features of the Zionist Peace/ What are the Goals of Those Claiming for Ceasefire in Lebanon?
- In case Israel Attacks Iraq, It Will Pay Heavy Costs
- US Policies do not Alter with Change of Presidents
- Israel’s Strategy: A Feeble Attack but a Media Grandiosity
- Ali Mattar’s Significant Explanations on Hochstein’s Trip and US and Israel’s Conditions
- Would the Hamas Movement Come to an End with the Martyrdom of Yahaya Sinwar
- The Psychological Warfare of the Zionist Regime and the Need for a Credible Narration
- October 7th and a Return to the Zero Point/Why Israel is Thrown Back 70 Years
- Leader awards Fath badge to Gen. Hajizadeh for missile op
- Haifa vs. Dahieh is Strongly Pursued by the Resistance
- A Look at Trump’s Second Administration: A War Formation or a Political Gesture
- The Haifa – Dahieh Equation Hizbollah’s Secretary General has Kept his Promise
- Kamala Harris became the victim of Joe Biden’s political outcomes
- Features of the Zionist Peace/ What are the Goals of Those Claiming for Ceasefire in Lebanon?
- In case Israel Attacks Iraq, It Will Pay Heavy Costs
- US Policies do not Alter with Change of Presidents
- Israel’s Strategy: A Feeble Attack but a Media Grandiosity
- Ali Mattar’s Significant Explanations on Hochstein’s Trip and US and Israel’s Conditions
- Would the Hamas Movement Come to an End with the Martyrdom of Yahaya Sinwar