Is Muqtada al-Sadr part of a project or the project itself?

Even his followers admit it , especially when he left his recent speech and apologized the following day. And dozens of other examples.

He boycotts parliamentary elections and eventually claims to form a government by participating in them.

Hasty decisions, lack of interaction with political groups, especially the Shiite sect, and the preference of interests of political party over national ones are some of the characteristics of Muqtada al-Sadr that do not allow him to even have a glimpse of the main arrangement behind the scenes of Iraqi politics.

As a political leader who is at least accountable to his supporters Muqtada al-Sadr should give a reasonable answer to these questions:

With regards to which motive of Iraqi national interests and Islam is the Shiite house dismantled and a rift was creates within it?

– What was the purpose of the election and its boycott, and why did he participate after the boycotting it?

Why Are his positions contrary to the convergence of the Shiite House when a political matter rises?

Why did he refuse to unite with shiite for the sake of Iraq’s peace of for independence?
In the current situation, why did he ask the members of his faction to resign so that maybe the ground for the dissolution of the parliament and the return of the instability project will be provided.
There have been many questions over the years about Muqtada al-Sadr’s contradictory behavior and approach, all of which can perhaps be summed up in one sentence: that Sadr is not willing to put national information interest.
C c ahead of current interests.
Rarely have we seen Sadr willing to back down or make concessions in the national interest of Iraq.

This is while all the currents of the Shiite House emphasized only the establishment, peace and security of Iraq and the national interests, regardless of the political participation.
Thus, in the most optimistic assessment, Muqtada seems to be playing on the ground of the American scenario rather than the interests of Iraq.